Skip to main content
. 2012 Oct 10;5(1):287–291. doi: 10.3892/etm.2012.743

Table III.

Difference of obstetric complications between the two treatment groups.

Variable Preterm labor Preeclampsia FGR PROM GDM Total complications
Total, n=129 (%) 9 (6.98) 3 (2.33) 4 (3.10) 4 (3.10) 3 (2.33) 23 (17.38)
Traditional treatment, n=87 (%) 8 (9.20) 3 (3.45) 3 (3.45) 3 (3.45) 3 (3.45) 20 (22.99)
Comprehensive treatment, n=41 (%) 1 (2.38) 0 (0.00) 1 (2.38) 1 (2.38) 0 (0.00) 3 (7.14)
P-value NS NS NS NS NS 0.028

The traditional treatment group was provided with prednisone plus aspirin. The comprehensive treatment group was provided with prednisone and aspirin plus low molecular weight heparin and intravenous immunoglobulin. Twenty women had pregnancy complications, of whom 17 had one complication, two had premature labor and preeclampsia, and one had premature labor and PROM. Qualitative variables were analyzed using the Chi-square test; P<0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant result. NS, not significant; FGR, fetal growth restriction; PROM, premature rupture of membrane; GDM, gestational diabetes mellitus.