Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Dec 18.
Published in final edited form as: J Res Read. 2011 Feb 15;34(1):77–93. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9817.2010.01488.x

Table 4.

Bayesian parameter estimates for English phonological awareness regressed on stage 1 random intercepts.

2.5% 50% 97.5%
Model 1: Receptive language subtest of TELD-3
Intercept 63.17 80.22 100.61
Stage 1 estimated intercept −0.01 0.79 1.45
Residual variation 85.88 121.36 175.60
Model 2: PPVT-III
Intercept 72.88 84.44 98.25
Stage 1 estimated intercept* 0.05 0.31 0.52
Residual variation 83.63 118.18 171.00
Model 3: Auditory language subtest of PLS-3
Intercept 96.06 116.89 141.79
Stage 1 estimated intercept −1.20 −0.52 0.01
Residual variation 87.80 124.08 179.53
Model 4: TVIP
Intercept 97.36 103.27 110.33
Stage 1 estimated intercept* −0.81 −0.37 −0.05
Residual variation 87.69 123.92 179.31

Note: TELD-3 = Test of Early Language Development-3; PPVT-III = Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test-III; PLS-3 = Preschool Language Scale-3; TVIP = Test de vocabulario en Imágenes Peabody. An R2 value was determined at .09 for the PPVT-III; an R2 value was determined at .04 for the TVIP.

*

denotes significance (α = .05).