Table 2.
Percentage of visits recording staffing and customer factors, and mean ratings for staffing and customer related scales, by city.
Liverpool | Palma | Utrecht | Ljubljana | P | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Staff characteristics | ||||||
Fewer bar staff | % Yes | 16.7 | 70.0 | 38.6 | 10.0 | <0.001 |
Young staff | % Yes | 55.0 | 0.0 | 47.4 | 46.7 | <0.001 |
Male staff | % Yes | 48.3 | 26.7 | 73.7 | 60.0 | <0.001 |
Glass collectors | % Yes | 78.3 | 61.7 | 68.4 | 8.3 | <0.001 |
Staff behaviours | ||||||
Staff monitoring | Mean | 2.6 | 3.3 | 3.8 | 2.9 | 0.004 |
Staff coordination | Mean | 4.2 | 5.0 | 4.7 | 3.8 | 0.002 |
Staff attitude | Mean | 1.5 | 3.2 | 2.1 | 1.7 | <0.001 |
Staff boundaries | Mean | 1.3 | 3.4 | 3.4 | 1.6 | <0.001 |
Permissiveness | Mean | 2.9 | 1.8 | 2.4 | 0.9 | <0.001 |
Customer type | ||||||
Male clientele | % Yes | 60.0 | 75.0 | 63.2 | 81.7 | 0.033 |
Young clientele | % Yes | 11.7 | 8.3 | 33.3 | 11.7 | 0.001 |
Single sex groups | % Yes | 70.0 | 36.7 | 77.2 | 30.0 | <0.001 |
Customer behaviours | ||||||
Dancing | Mean | 4.5 | 3.7 | 4.8 | 3.3 | 0.033 |
Sexual activity | Mean | 3.2 | 3.1 | 3.0 | 2.6 | 0.436 |
Sexual competition | Mean | 3.5 | 2.7 | 2.7 | 1.7 | <0.001 |
Rowdiness | Mean | 3.3 | 2.9 | 3.2 | 0.9 | <0.001 |
Movement | Mean | 4.8 | 4.7 | 4.9 | 4.0 | 0.099 |
Additional variables | ||||||
Police outside | % Yes | 33.3 | 18.3 | 7.3 | 1.7 | <0.001 |
Outdoor area | % Yes | 23.3 | 66.7 | 63.2 | 86.7 | <0.001 |
100+ customers | % Yes | 63.3 | 81.7 | 59.6 | 35.0 | <0.001 |
Intoxication * | Mean | 4.0 | 3.7 | 4.0 | 3.5 | 0.313 |
* Main variable of interest.