Table 3.
Hierarchical modelling: Associations between environmental characteristics and customer intoxication ratings.
Multivariate | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Bivariate | Block analysis | Model 1 | Model 2 | ||||||
Variable | Estimate | P | Estimate | P | Estimate | P | Estimate | P | |
Contextual variables # | >100 customers | 0.945 | *** | 0.037 | ns | 0.139 | ns | ||
Later visit | 1.223 | *** | 0.483 | * | 0.740 | *** | |||
Venue entrance | Door staff | 1. 017 | ** | 0.496 | ns | ||||
Queue | 0.715 | * | −0.229 | ns | |||||
Entrance fee | 0.823 | * | 0.124 | ns | |||||
House rules (entry) | 0.201 | ns | 0.142 | ns | |||||
Physical environment | Seating | 0.240 | *** | 0.062 | ns | ||||
Noise level | 0.282 | *** | 0.060 | ns | |||||
Movement/Crowding | 0.191 | *** | 0.087 | * | 0.025 | ns | 0.056 | ns | |
Ventilation/Lighting | 0.280 | *** | 0.092 | ns | |||||
Temperature | 0.380 | *** | 0.058 | ns | |||||
Clearing/Cleanliness | 0.139 | *** | 0.017 | ns | |||||
Glass on floor | 0.296 | *** | 0.030 | ns | |||||
Toilets | 0.316 | *** | 0.128 | * | 0.097 | * | 0.103 | * | |
Bar activities | Dancefloor | 1.252 | *** | 0.993 | *** | 0.269 | ns | 0.557 | * |
Pool tables | −0.046 | ns | −0.181 | ns | |||||
TV screens | 0.282 | ns | 0.569 | * | 0.107 | ns | 0.266 | ns | |
House rules (inside) | −0.132 | ns | −0.093 | ns | |||||
Rock/heavy music | −0.312 | ns | −0.026 | ns | |||||
Rap/hiphop music | 0.080 | ns | −0.217 | ns | |||||
Pop/dance music | 0.115 | ns | −0.286 | ns | |||||
Alcohol and food service | Alcoholic drink promotions | 0.297 | ns | 0.336 | ns | ||||
Low drink prices | −0.350 | ns | −0.344 | ns | |||||
Soft drink promotions | 0.888 | ** | 0.833 | ** | 0.631 | * | 0.690 | ** | |
Plastic glassware | 0.706 | ** | 0.818 | ** | 0.602 | ** | 0.614 | ** | |
Table service | −0.936 | ** | −0.882 | ** | 0.031 | ns | −0.090 | ns | |
Food service | −1.183 | * | −0.394 | ns | |||||
Venue staff | Fewer bar staff | 0.345 | ns | −0.027 | ns | ||||
Young staff | −0.084 | ns | 0.020 | ns | |||||
Male staff | 0.406 | ns | 0.202 | ns | |||||
Glass collectors | 0.539 | * | 0.235 | ns | |||||
Staff monitoring | 0.209 | *** | 0.163 | ** | 0.071 | ns | 0.081 | ns | |
Staff coordination | 0.024 | ns | −0.113 | ns | |||||
Staff attitude | 0.206 | * | 0.181 | ns | |||||
Staff boundaries | 0.130 | * | 0.052 | ns | |||||
Permissiveness | 0.526 | *** | 0.425 | *** | 0.160 | * | 0.298 | *** | |
Customer factors | Male clientele | −0.017 | ns | −0.018 | ns | ||||
Young clientele | 0.886 | ** | 0.590 | * | 0.316 | ns | |||
Single sex groups | 0.089 | ns | −0.081 | ns | |||||
High alcohol drinks | 0.181 | ns | 0.047 | ns | |||||
Dancing | 0.276 | *** | 0.126 | ** | 0.073 | ns | |||
Sexual activity/competition | 0.237 | *** | 0.085 | * | 0.065 | * | |||
Rowdiness | 0.460 | *** | 0.243 | *** | 0.125 | ns |
Analysis uses hierarchical modelling. # These two variables were included in all block analyses. ns = not significant; * P < 0.05; ** P < 0.01; *** P < 0.001. For significant associations in multivariate analyses, slope direction indicates whether the variable was associated with an increase or decrease (-) in intoxication rating.