Skip to main content
. 2005 Mar 1;2(1):20–27. doi: 10.1186/1479-7364-2-1-20

Table 2.

Fitting the pairwise data to the physical (kilobase) map

Population N m ε M Lp -2lnL df Vkb Swept radius(kb)
COS 132,171 1,691 0.01024 0.738 0.091 339,109 132,169 2.566 97.6
AF 87,135 1,338 0.01243 0.661 0.136 114,123 87,133 1.310 80.4
CA 71,097 1,211 0.01043 0.877 0.135 109,046 71,095 1.534 95.9
CE 111,067 1,518 0.00953 0.805 0.197 102,478 111,065 0.923 104.9
AS 64,586 1,153 0.01117 0.861 0.204 52,781 64,584 0.817 89.6

N: Number of pairs; m: number of loci; ε M, Lp: Malecot parameters; -2lnL: composite -2 log likelihood; df: degrees of freedom; swept radius: 1/ε; Vkb: residual error variance on fitting pairwise data to the kilobase map; COS: Cosmopolitan sample; AF: African - American; CA: UK Caucasians; CE: Utah CEPH founders; AS: Japanese and Chinese.