Skip to main content
. 2006 Jun 1;2(6):353–367. doi: 10.1186/1479-7364-2-6-353

Table 2.

Results from STRUCTURE 2.0 on the Pima-Surui data with 100 randomly selected markers without missing genotypes.

Ka Run 1b Run 2b Run 3b Run 4b Run 5b
1 -10849.6 -10847.8 -10850.1 -10848.9 -10849.5

2 -9616.9 -9619.3 -9619.4 -9629.2 -9614.2

3 -9417 -9418.3 -9412.9 -9529.3 -9498.3

4 -9648.8 -9369.8 -9557 -9397.9 -9445.7

5 -9303.7 -9472.3 -9346.6 -9405.1 -9317

6 -9541.6 -10457.2 -9315.6 -9484.1 -11348.8

7 -9408.4 -10576.9 -10151.4 -9443.4 -10938.6

8 -9451.9 -9369.1 -10715.4 -9393.1 -10304.5

9 -10403.1 -9450.7 -9489.1 -10100.8 -9205.1

aK is the number of clusters/subpopulations; bDifferent runs of STRUCTURE 2.0.