Skip to main content
. 2012 Jan 12;10(4):541–561. doi: 10.2203/dose-response.11-035.Fornalski

TABLE 5.

The fitted slopes [%/mSv/year] for the adjusted (Table 4) and unadjusted (Table 2) data; uncertainties represent one standard deviation (68% CI, confidence intervals).

Absolute increase of cancer deaths [%/mSv/year] (68% CI) Relative risk (RR) [%/mSv/year] (68% CI)

adjusted results* unadjusted results** adjusted results* unadjusted results**
all cancers −0.30 (−0.45; −0.09) −0.77 (−0.90; −0.44) −1.17 (−1.51; −0.60) −3.07 (−3.43; −2.18)
2 = 2.8; p=0.08) 2 = 1.5; p=0.01) 2 = 6.3; p=0.02) 2 = 1.8; p=0.0003)
lung cancers −0.19 (−0.48; +0.14) −1.80 (−2.04; −1.18) −0.82 (−1.55; +0.10) −7.37 (−8.14; −5.40)
2 = 0.8; p=0.3) 2 = 3.7; p=0.002) 2 = 1.7; p=0.2) 2 = 5.0; p=0.0001)

classical method of least squares parameter estimation with two degrees of freedom (effective dose uncertainties taken into consideration)

results presented in Figs 4 and 5

*

see Table 4

**

see Table 2