Skip to main content
. 2012 Dec 19;13(Suppl 19):S18. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-13-S19-S18

Table 3.

E. coli (SRR001665) 24-tile assembly results in terms of contiguity, accuracy, and statistics.

Evaluations Continuity Accuracy Statistics

Contig # NG50 (kbp) NG50 corr. (kbp) SNP Indels Misjoins Asm. (%) Unaligned ref. (%) Duplicated ref. (%)
Velvet 25k 147 87.0 67.3 238 37 2 97.89 0.56 0.01

Tiger-Velvet-R 51i 281 95.6 87.2 190 35 3 100.92 0.14 2.30

Tiger-Velvet-I 7i 276 95.4 87.2 211 33 12 100.40 0.12 1.68

SOAPdenovo 27k 450 17.9 17.9 12 4 1 97.56 1.31 0.00

Tiger-Soap-R 80i 524 25.6 25.6 31 11 3 98.67 1.20 0.78

Tiger-Soap-I 7i 509 25.8 25.8 23 6 2 98.78 0.80 0.64

The columns include the number of contigs, NG50 size and its error-corrected size, the number of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), the number of indels and misjoins in contigs, total assembly length, genome coverage (100 - Unaligned ref.), and duplications. K-mer 25 and 27 are the best k-mer sizes for Velvet and SOAPdenovo, respectively. "#k" stands for the applied k-mer size. "#i" stands for the iteration number. Both Tiger-Velvet-I and Tiger-Soap-I evaluations use the best results from Velvet and SOAPdenovo as input, respectively.