Skip to main content
. 2012 Dec 19;7(12):e51928. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0051928

Table 4. Prevalence (number and percentage) of misconduct policies and procedures for responding between journals published by Elsevier or Wiley-Blackwell.

Policy Elsevier (n = 90) Wiley-Blackwell (n = 59) P
Mention of misconduct 69 (76.7) 42 (71.2) 0.453
Definition of misconduct 27 (30.0) 28 (47.5) 0.031
Falsification 11 (12.2) 26 (44.1) <0.001
Fabrication 8 (8.9) 24 (40.7) <0.001
Plagiarism 56 (62.2) 34 (57.6) 0.575
Duplication 60 (66.7) 36 (61.0) 0.481
Other criteria of misconduct 16 (17.8) 6 (10.2) 0.200
Image manipulation 31 (35.2) 29 (49.2) 0.092
Plagiarism-checking service 33 (36.7) 10 (16.9) 0.009
Procedures for responding 34 (37.8) 30 (51.7) 0.095
Retraction 25 (27.8) 25 (43.1) 0.054
Expression of concern 11 (12.2) 23 (39.7) <0.001