Skip to main content
. 2012 Sep 21;13:242. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-13-242

Table 4.

Pearson correlation coefficients calculated for selected GOBA metrics for the CASP9-in-contest test set

  metaGA GA_468 GA_579 yGA_468 yGA_579 yGA_579†
T0520
 0.47
 0.74
 0.38
 0.8
 0.84
 0.98
T0529 FM
 0.17
 0.22
 0.14
 0.39
 0.19
 0.10
T0543
 0.43
 0.51
 0.61
 0.39
 0.24
 0.96
T0547 FM
 0.01
 −0.01
 0.11
 0.76
 0.76
 0.81
T0561 FM
 0.26
 0.37
 0.36
 0.35
 0.38
 0.53
T0580
 0.54
 0.64
 0.56
 0.65
 0.57
 0.96
T0584
 0.74
 0.76
 0.75
 0.91
 0.92
 0.96
T0596
 0.38
 0.43
 0.47
 0.65
 0.66
 0.83
T0600
 0.67
 0.68
 0.68
 0.65
 0.64
 0.84
T0604* FM
 0.33
 0.32
 0.34
 0.81
 0.67
 0.88
T0614
 0.47
 0.46
 0.56
 0.59
 0.57
 0.56
T0619
 0.17
 0.1
 0.12
 0.21
 0.21
 0.94
T0622
 0.57
 0.62
 0.64
 0.49
 0.51
 0.66
T0628*
 0.29
 0.38
 0.38
 −0.14
 −0.15
 0.36
T0630*
 −0.40
 −0.4
 −0.38
 −0.27
 −0.26
 −0.16
T0643 0.58 0.6 0.62 0.25 0.22 0.48

Asterisks mark targets, for which GOBA the performance is explained in text. Last column (marked with a cross sign) lists the results from CASP9 validation for corresponding targets. Scores with the greatest improvements in terms of yGA579 were underlined.