Skip to main content
. 2012 Dec 19;7(12):e49717. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0049717

Table 2. Summary of efficacy (N = 300 patients).

Study Treatment DCR RR CR PR SD Median PFS (mo) Median OS (mo)
Siegel 2008 [15] Bevacizumab 30 (65.0%) 6 (13.0%) 1 (2.2%) 5 (10.9%) 24 (52.0%) 6.9 12.4
Hsu 2010 [16] Bevacizumab/capecitabine 23 (51.1%) 4 (8.9%) 0 (0%) 4 (8.9%) 19 (42.2%) 2.7 5.9
Sun 2011 [17] Bevacizumab/CAPOX 31 (77.5%) 8 (20.0%) 0 (0%) 8 (20.0%) 23 (57.5%) 6.8 9.8
Kaseb 2012 [18] Bevacizumab/erlotinib 47 (79.6%) 14 (23.7%) 0 (0%) 14 (23.7%) 33 (55.9%) 7.2 13.7
Thomas 2009 [19] Bevacizumab/erlotinib 27 (67.5%) 10 (25.0%) 0 (0%) 10 (25.0%) 17 (42.5%) 9.0 15.7
Yau 2012 [20] Bevacizumab/erlotinib 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1.5 4.4
Philip 2012 [21] Bevacizumab/erlotinib 12 (44.4%) 1 (2.1%) 0 (0%) 1 (2.1%) 11 (40.7%) 3.0 9.5
Zhu 2006 [22] Bevacizumab/GEMOX 14 (42.0%) 6 (18.0%) 0 (0%) 6 (18.0%) 8 (24.0%) 5.3 9.6

DCR: Disease control rate (CR+PR+SD); RR: Response rate (CR+PR); CR: Complete response; PR: Partial response; SD: Stable disease; PFS: Progression-free survival; OS: Overall survival; CAPOX: Capecitabine+oxaliplatin; GEMOX: Gemcitabine+oxaliplatin; mo: months.