Table 2. Summary of efficacy (N = 300 patients).
Study | Treatment | DCR | RR | CR | PR | SD | Median PFS (mo) | Median OS (mo) |
Siegel 2008 [15] | Bevacizumab | 30 (65.0%) | 6 (13.0%) | 1 (2.2%) | 5 (10.9%) | 24 (52.0%) | 6.9 | 12.4 |
Hsu 2010 [16] | Bevacizumab/capecitabine | 23 (51.1%) | 4 (8.9%) | 0 (0%) | 4 (8.9%) | 19 (42.2%) | 2.7 | 5.9 |
Sun 2011 [17] | Bevacizumab/CAPOX | 31 (77.5%) | 8 (20.0%) | 0 (0%) | 8 (20.0%) | 23 (57.5%) | 6.8 | 9.8 |
Kaseb 2012 [18] | Bevacizumab/erlotinib | 47 (79.6%) | 14 (23.7%) | 0 (0%) | 14 (23.7%) | 33 (55.9%) | 7.2 | 13.7 |
Thomas 2009 [19] | Bevacizumab/erlotinib | 27 (67.5%) | 10 (25.0%) | 0 (0%) | 10 (25.0%) | 17 (42.5%) | 9.0 | 15.7 |
Yau 2012 [20] | Bevacizumab/erlotinib | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 1.5 | 4.4 |
Philip 2012 [21] | Bevacizumab/erlotinib | 12 (44.4%) | 1 (2.1%) | 0 (0%) | 1 (2.1%) | 11 (40.7%) | 3.0 | 9.5 |
Zhu 2006 [22] | Bevacizumab/GEMOX | 14 (42.0%) | 6 (18.0%) | 0 (0%) | 6 (18.0%) | 8 (24.0%) | 5.3 | 9.6 |
DCR: Disease control rate (CR+PR+SD); RR: Response rate (CR+PR); CR: Complete response; PR: Partial response; SD: Stable disease; PFS: Progression-free survival; OS: Overall survival; CAPOX: Capecitabine+oxaliplatin; GEMOX: Gemcitabine+oxaliplatin; mo: months.