Table 3. Proportions of unique identical ITS reads shared between bite mark and teeth samples included in comparative analyses.
B1 | B3 | B4 | B5 | B6 | B7 | B8 | B9 | B10 | B12 | B13 | B14 | B15 | B16 | |
T1 | 0.52 | 0.19 | 0.38 | 0.17 | 0.11 | 0.23 | 0.27 | 0.16 | 0.17 | 0.07 | 0.13 | 0.10 | 0.28 | 0.12 |
T3 | 0.38 | 0.36 | 0.54 | 0.23 | 0.17 | 0.25 | 0.24 | 0.20 | 0.12 | 0.07 | 0.16 | 0.08 | 0.22 | 0.11 |
T4 | 0.33 | 0.19 | 0.69 | 0.17 | 0.28 | 0.14 | 0.18 | 0.16 | 0.09 | 0.05 | 0.13 | 0.05 | 0.17 | 0.08 |
T5 | 0.24 | 0.17 | 0.31 | 0.35 | 0.19 | 0.18 | 0.15 | 0.18 | 0.10 | 0.07 | 0.14 | 0.05 | 0.17 | 0.10 |
T6 | 0.19 | 0.10 | 0.23 | 0.15 | 0.25 | 0.07 | 0.09 | 0.10 | 0.07 | 0.05 | 0.13 | 0.08 | 0.11 | 0.06 |
T7 | 0.33 | 0.19 | 0.38 | 0.23 | 0.11 | 0.39 | 0.27 | 0.12 | 0.16 | 0.04 | 0.13 | 0.04 | 0.11 | 0.06 |
T8 | 0.19 | 0.07 | 0.15 | 0.10 | 0.06 | 0.18 | 0.48 | 0.10 | 0.16 | 0.09 | 0.13 | 0.03 | 0.06 | 0.11 |
T9 | 0.29 | 0.19 | 0.38 | 0.21 | 0.11 | 0.18 | 0.21 | 0.30 | 0.14 | 0.03 | 0.08 | 0.03 | 0.11 | 0.04 |
T10 | 0.33 | 0.14 | 0.38 | 0.13 | 0.08 | 0.25 | 0.48 | 0.18 | 0.33 | 0.09 | 0.21 | 0.04 | 0.06 | 0.06 |
T12 | 0.48 | 0.29 | 0.46 | 0.35 | 0.25 | 0.34 | 0.27 | 0.38 | 0.22 | 0.24 | 0.33 | 0.06 | 0.17 | 0.18 |
T13 | 0.52 | 0.33 | 0.46 | 0.35 | 0.22 | 0.30 | 0.24 | 0.32 | 0.25 | 0.18 | 0.45 | 0.12 | 0.33 | 0.23 |
T14 | 0.29 | 0.17 | 0.23 | 0.31 | 0.17 | 0.25 | 0.21 | 0.28 | 0.13 | 0.08 | 0.14 | 0.32 | 0.11 | 0.12 |
T15 | 0.24 | 0.21 | 0.23 | 0.19 | 0.22 | 0.23 | 0.18 | 0.34 | 0.13 | 0.12 | 0.18 | 0.03 | 0.28 | 0.20 |
T16 | 0.43 | 0.33 | 0.54 | 0.21 | 0.19 | 0.27 | 0.24 | 0.40 | 0.19 | 0.14 | 0.25 | 0.10 | 0.39 | 0.29 |
Bold numbers indicate the highest proportion of identical reads in each column. Bite mark samples (B) and teeth samples (T) from the same participant have corresponding identifying numbers. The number of 16S rRNA reads in bite mark sample 2 and the number of rpoB reads in bite mark sample 11 was less than 10 therefore were omitted from comparative analyses of all loci. For bite mark sample 8, the corresponding teeth sample and teeth sample 10 share the same proportion however, the latter was selected because this data set contained the least number of reads (Figure 2).