Skip to main content
. 2012 Jul 31;21(10):1467–1480. doi: 10.1002/pro.2136

Table I.

Effect of pH on Kinetics and Thermodynamics of Binding PA to CMG2

PA variant pH ka (×104) (M−1 s−1) kd (×10−5) (s−1) KDa (M) EA (kJ mol−1)
WT 8 2.90 (0.02)b 4.00 (0.08) 1.4 × 10−9 44.70 (0.07)
8c 3.00 (0.05)
7.5 3.60 (0.02) 41.00 (0.13)
7 4.20 (0.01) 40.20 (0.05)
6 6.50 (0.02) 4.60 (0.16) 7.0 × 10−10 30.20 (0.04)
6c 5.90 (0.04)
5 ND 4.40 (0.08) ND 30.00 (0.12)
W346F 8 0.63 (0.03) 38.40 (0.16) 6.1 × 10−8 51.00 (0.10)
6 1.00 (0.05) 48.30 (0.21) 4.8 × 10−8 23.80 (0.23)
2FHis 8 3.50 (0.01) 4.40 (0.08) 1.3 × 10−9 49.20 (0.10)
7.5 4.30 (0.02) 48.20 (0.12)
7 4.70 (0.02) 41.50 (0.07)
6 10.00 (0.004) 3.10 (0.16) 3.1 × 10−10 41.90 (0.02)
5 37.00 (0.02) 10.50 (0.16) 2.8 × 10−10 34.70 (0.15)
a

The equilibrium dissociation constant is calculated from the association and dissociation rate constants according to KD = kd/ka.

b

Error is in parentheses

c

Measured using constant ionic strength conditions: 100 mM Tris/50 mM MES/50 mM Acetic acid.32