Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: Ann Assoc Am Geogr. 2012 Apr 3;102(5):986–995. doi: 10.1080/00045608.2012.659621

Table 1.

Descriptive statistics and results for Brown–Forsythe test

r Population
Incidence rate/100,000 births
Brown–Forsythe
Min Max M Mdn Min Max M Mdn Variance FBF1 df1 CV FBF2 df2 CV
1,000 1 33 6.1 5 0 66,667 1003.4 0 20,571,812 3.99 9 1.88
1,500 1 64 11.0 9 0 50,000 1056.0 0 14,896,288 5.53 8 1.94 0.63 1 3.84
2,000 1 90 17.3 14 0 50,000 1081.4 0 10,762,540 6.59 7 2.01 0.84 2 3.00
2,500 1 126 25.0 20 0 33,333 1046.4 0 7,735,246 5.53 6 2.10 0.64 3 2.61
3,000 1 175 33.9 28 0 33,333 1016.9 0 5,797,722 4.45 5 2.21 0.66 4 2.37
3,500 1 221 44.0 36 0 25,000 989.8 0 4,489,869 3.36 4 2.37 0.93 5 2.21
4,000 1 285 55.2 45 0 20,000 963.9 0 3,619,704 2.31 3 2.61 1.42 6 2.10
4,500 1 345 67.5 56 0 14,286 941.5 0 2,935,198 1.48 2 3.00 2.09 7 2.01
5,000 2 388 80.7 67 0 12,903 919.3 0 2,443,491 0.73 1 3.84 2.95 8 1.94
5,500 2 427 94.8 80 0 11,111 899.2 0 2,081,109 3.99 9 1.88

Note: Bold figures in the FBF1 and FBF2 columns are the upper and lower limit of neighborhood scale, and the bold figure in the r column is the neighborhood size chosen for this analysis. r = size of the neighborhood radius in meters; df = degrees of freedom; CV1 and CV2 = critical values at 95 percent confidence level for FBF1 and FBF2.