Skip to main content
. 2012 Nov 20;7:195. doi: 10.1186/1748-717X-7-195

Table 2.

Overview of miRNAs with significantly different levels of expression in rectal tumors of responders and non-responders to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy

MiRNAs R NR Fold change (NR vs R) P-value Putative targets†#
miR-450b-5p
U
D
0.07
0.0003
RANBP9, SLC19A2, XIAP, RGMB, SMAD2, SERPINA5, SOX2, TCF5, TIMP2, TGFBR2
let-7e
U
D
0.48
0.0075
NRAS#, KRAS#, SOCS1#, HMGA2#, ABCC5, HOXD1, MASP1, ERCC6, IGF1
miR-450a
U
D
0.16
0,0104
MAP3K2, RAB31, TOPBP1, CREB1, DNMT3A, EGFR, ERCC5
miR-99a*
U
D
0,21
0,0163
RAD51C, RAD9B, TIAM1, TMEM87a, TMEM71, SOCS4, RANBP4, RANBP6
miR-190b
D
U
4.03
0.0290
CDKN1B, MUC17, MYCBP2, SMAD2, TCF4, CASP2, TP53INP1
miR-29b-2*
D
U
4.25
0.0375
AKT3, RANBP9, PARP2, HDAC5, CDKN3, AGR2, SLC19A2, FOXN3
miR-215
D
U
4.40
0.040
ZEB2#, ALCAM#, TYMS (TS) #, DHFR#, EREG, HOXB9, NOD2
miR-196b U D 0.42 0,043 HOXB8#, HOXC8#, ERG#, BACH1#, FAS, TBRG1, TOX3

Legend: R – responders, NR – non-responders, D – down-regulated expression, U – up-regulated expression. # Target is experimentally validated. Putative targets were predicted using miRWalk database and miRanda algorith (21) and subsequently selected on the basis of their significance in tumor biology, particularly in the processes of cell survival and resistance to anti-cancer treatment.