Table 1. Summary of manual and script analysis of images used for BUHO adjustment.
Treatment | Cell number | SG number | Cells with SGs | SGs per cell | ||||
Manual | BUHO | Manual | BUHO | Manual | BUHO | Manual | BUHO | |
basal | 18 | 18 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
basal | 16 | 16 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
basal | 21 | 21 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
stress 1 | 20 | 20 | 56 | 52 | 12 | 11 | 4.7 | 4.3 |
stress 2 | 20 | 20 | 40 | 40 | 11 | 11 | 3.6 | 3.6 |
stress 3 | 24 | 24 | 40 | 42 | 12 | 12 | 3.3 | 3.3 |
stress 4 | 18 | 18 | 12 | 12 | 5 | 5 | 2.4 | 2.4 |
stress 5 | 16 | 16 | 47 | 47 | 8 | 8 | 5.4 | 5.4 |
stress 6 | 27 | 27 | 87 | 89 | 17 | 17 | 5.1 | 5.2 |
Summary 1–6 | 125 | 125 | 282 | 280 | 65 | 64 | 4.3 | 4.4 |
Nine images from wells treated or not with arsenite (training set) were manually analyzed. Cells were considered positive when they contain two or more SGs [33]. Average number of SGs in the SG-positive cells is indicated. These values were used to tune the MATLAB script and values computed after BUHO optimization with this training set are indicated.