Skip to main content
. 2012 Dec;41(8):649–655. doi: 10.1259/dmf/81804525

Table 2. Relationships between data compared with Pearson correlation coefficient and Passing–Bablok method, sample size for each group: n = 70.

Comparison devices (size of voxel) r2 Intercept a (95% CI) Slope b (95% CI)
CBCT 9500 (200 µm), CBCT 9000 (76 µm) 0.9997 −0.377 (−1.62 to 0.709) 1.002 (0.994–1.009)
CBCT 9500 (200 µm), micro-CT (41 µm) 0.9997 −0.624 (−2.158 to 0.411) 0.996 (0.988–1.006)
CBCT 9500 (300 µm), CBCT 9000 (76 µm) 0.9996 −1.925 (−3.318 to −0.851) 1.009 (1.002–1.018)
CBCT 9500 (300 µm), micro-CT (41 µm) 0.9998 −1.883 (−3.008 to −1.129) 1.004 (0.998–1.012)

CI, confidence interval; CBCT, cone beam CT.