Skip to main content
. 2012 Oct 24;12:269. doi: 10.1186/1471-2334-12-269

Table 2.

MRSA Prevalence and Transmission Risk for 26 Nursing Homes

  No. Beds MRSA Admission Prevalencea MRSA Point Prevalence Estimated MRSA Transmission Riskb
NH1
124
3% (3)
8% (8)
5%
NH2
59
4% (2)
22% (22)
19%
NH3
145
8% (8)
30% (30)
24%
NH4
208
9% (9)
19% (19)
11%
NH5
137
10% (5)
25% (17)
16%
NH6
24
11% (11)
7% (7)
0%
NH7
198
12% (12)
22% (22)
11%
NH8
80
13% (13)
25% (25)
14%
NH9
99
14% (7)
27% (27)
15%
NH10
99
16% (16)
31% (31)
18%
NH11
99
16% (16)
37% (37)
25%
NH12
98
16% (16)
39% (29)
27%
NH13
255
20% (20)
42% (42)
28%
NH14
99
21% (21)
16% (16)
0%
NH15
145
22% (11)
34% (34)
15%
NH16
138
22% (22)
30% (30)
10%
NH17
182
25% (25)
39% (39)
19%
NH18
99
29% (29)
44% (44)
21%
NH19
143
31% (31)
52% (52)
30%
NH20
46
-----
0% (0)
n/a
NH21
124
-----
2% (1)
n/a
NH22
45
-----
10% (4)
n/a
NH23
41
-----
16% (4)
n/a
NH24
99
-----
26% (13)
n/a
NH25
30
-----
27% (8)
n/a
NH26
46
-----
28% (10)
n/a
Mean (SD)
110 (58)
16% (8)
25% (13)
16% (8)
Median (range) 99 (24–255) 16% (3–31) 26% (0–52) 15% (0–30)

a Admission prevalence swabs were not collected for nursing homes 20 through 26 due to small facility size and minimal resident turnover.

b Estimated transmission risk was calculated as the absolute difference (MRSA point – admission prevalence) divided by the number of at risk patients per 100 admitted. For example, for NH3, transmission risk = (30% - 8%) / (100–8) = 24%.