Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Dec 1.
Published in final edited form as: Autism Res. 2012 Sep 7;5(6):407–418. doi: 10.1002/aur.1252

Figure 2.

Figure 2

(A): Intentionality scores on ToM and Random conditions, for UCLA and SUNY. Black represents individuals with VCFS and light grey represents controls. Across groups, performance in the ToM condition was significantly better at SUNY in comparison to UCLA. At both sites, in comparison to individuals with VCFS, controls had significantly higher performance in the ToM condition, but did not differ on the Random Condition. Significance levels are indicated as follows: *** pFDR<0.001; ** pFDR<0.01; * pFDR<0.05. Raw scores, rather than age adjusted scores, are presented for visualization purposes. (B) Appropriateness scores on ToM and Random conditions, for UCLA and SUNY. A similar pattern of results was observed for both the Appropriateness and Intentionality ratings (Figure 2A).