Table 5.
GluA1 alone | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conductance level | Derkach et al. 1999 10 μm AMPA | Banke et al. 2000† 10 μm glutamate | Fucile et al. 2006 1 μm AMPA | Kristensen et al. 2011 2 mm glutamate | This study 10 mm glutamate | GluA1 + TARP This study 10 mm glutamate |
1 | 8–9** | 4 | *** | 4–5** | *** | 10–12* |
2 | 12–14** | 8 | 11 | 9 | 7.6 | 19–25* |
3 | 19–21** | 15 | 15 | 14–15** | 12.9 | 37–43* |
4 | 28–30** | 25 | 22 | 21–25** | 24.8 | 56 |
Each of the four conductance levels is greater in the presence of TARP, in most cases at least doubling. Although previous work utilised different agonists and agonist concentrations, the four conductance levels detected were still all lower than the highest conductance levels seen when GluA1 was coexpressed with TARPs. *Dependent on which TARP was co-expressed. **Dependent on the phosphorylation state of the receptor. ***Only three conductance levels were observed. †The values from Banke et al. 2000 were calculated as the weighted means of the conductance levels given in their fig. 6 legend.