Skip to main content
. 2013 Jan;38(1):24–32. doi: 10.1503/jpn.110145

Table 3.

The effects of stimulus type on the 20 Hz and 40 Hz auditory steady state response

Auditory response; comparison 20 Hz stimuli 40 Hz stimuli


F p value η2G F p value η2G
20 Hz power
 Type, F1,42 21.87 < 0.001 0.042*
 Type × time, F5,210 0.52 0.63 0.001
20 Hz PLF
 Type, F1,42 42.14 < 0.001 0.101*
 Type × time, F5,210 0.23 0.91 0.001
40 Hz power
 Type, F1,42 9.42 0.004 0.005 28.83 < 0.001 0.025*
 Type × time, F5,210 0.31 0.87 0.000 11.54 < 0.001 0.010*
40 Hz PLF
 Type, F1,42 28.66 < 0.001 0.030* 32.01 < 0.001 0.027*
 Type × time, F5,210 1.86 0.12 0.003 8.09 < 0.001 0.009*

PLF = phase-locking factor.

*

p < 0.001.

p < 0.01.