Skip to main content
. 2012 Dec 19;63(606):e1–e10. doi: 10.3399/bjgp13X660724

Table 8.

Comparison of strategies to identify men at risk of having a diagnosis of different types of cancer based on the top 10% at highest risk for each cancer in the validation cohort

Top 10% of risk Risk threshold % True negative False negative False positive True positive Sensitivity % Specificity, % PPV, % NPV, %
Lung cancer 0.67 610 755 502 66 658 1259 71.5 90.2 1.9 99.9
Colorectal cancer 0.45 610 731 526 66 718 1199 69.5 90.2 1.8 99.9
Gastro-oesophageal 0.29 610 982 275 67 018 899 76.6 90.1 1.3 100.0
Pancreatic cancer 0.10 611 136 121 67 633 284 70.1 90.0 0.4 100.0
Renal tract cancer 0.20 611 026 231 66 815 1102 82.7 90.1 1.6 100.0
Prostate cancer 1.30 610 254 1 003 66 443 1474 59.5 90.2 2.2 99.8
Blood cancer 0.27 610 800 457 67 478 439 49.0 90.1 0.6 99.9
Testicular cancer 0.02 611 183 74 67 766 151 67.1 90.0 0.2 100.0
Other cancer 0.66 611 065 192 67 846 71 27.0 90.0 0.1 100.0

NPV = negative predictive value. PPV = positive predictive value.