Table 3.
Comparison of the subwatershed rankings for total amounts of soil erosion (kg/year) and soil erosion per unit area (kg/ha-year) resulting from the hydrologic characterization tool (HCT) and soil and water assessment tool (SWAT) models
Subwatershed number | Area (ha) | Rank by total soil erosion | Rank by soil erosion per area | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
HCT | SWAT | HCT | SWAT | ||
1 | 2277 | 3 | 3 | 10 | 7 |
2 | 1770 | 6 | 7 | 4 | 4 |
3 | 2197 | 5 | 8 | 8 | 10 |
4 | 2791 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 |
5 | 1822 | 8 | 6 | 7 | 5 |
6 | 4609 | 1 | 1 | 6 | 3 |
7 | 1623 | 7 | 9 | 3 | 9 |
8 | 978 | 13 | 15 | 2 | 13 |
9 | 1333 | 14 | 14 | 16 | 15 |
10 | 1834 | 11 | 11 | 14 | 17 |
11 | 1722 | 10 | 12 | 11 | 18 |
12 | 848 | 15 | 13 | 15 | 6 |
13 | 582 | 20 | 19 | 20 | 16 |
14 | 1582 | 9 | 10 | 5 | 12 |
15 | 2222 | 4 | 5 | 9 | 8 |
16 | 584 | 18 | 20 | 17 | 20 |
17 | 572 | 19 | 18 | 18 | 14 |
18 | 1041 | 16 | 16 | 19 | 19 |
19 | 1703 | 12 | 4 | 12 | 2 |
20 | 565 | 17 | 17 | 13 | 11 |
The bold letter indicates the top 30 % of overall subwatershed ranks