Skip to main content
. 2012 Nov 11;51(1):209–224. doi: 10.1007/s00267-012-9977-4

Table 3.

Comparison of the subwatershed rankings for total amounts of soil erosion (kg/year) and soil erosion per unit area (kg/ha-year) resulting from the hydrologic characterization tool (HCT) and soil and water assessment tool (SWAT) models

Subwatershed number Area (ha) Rank by total soil erosion Rank by soil erosion per area
HCT SWAT HCT SWAT
1 2277 3 3 10 7
2 1770 6 7 4 4
3 2197 5 8 8 10
4 2791 2 2 1 1
5 1822 8 6 7 5
6 4609 1 1 6 3
7 1623 7 9 3 9
8 978 13 15 2 13
9 1333 14 14 16 15
10 1834 11 11 14 17
11 1722 10 12 11 18
12 848 15 13 15 6
13 582 20 19 20 16
14 1582 9 10 5 12
15 2222 4 5 9 8
16 584 18 20 17 20
17 572 19 18 18 14
18 1041 16 16 19 19
19 1703 12 4 12 2
20 565 17 17 13 11

The bold letter indicates the top 30 % of overall subwatershed ranks