Table 5.
The ranks comparison of dCA/d$, dSL/dCA, and dSL/d$ under two scenarios with the cost indicator fully implemented and with indicator set at a uniform cost for all the subwatersheds
| Subwatershed number | Conservation cost indicator is fully implemented | Rank of dSL/dCA | Uniform conservation cost Indicator | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rank of dCA/d$ | Rank of dSL/d$ | Rank of dCA/d$ | Rank of dSL/d$ | ||
| 1 | 17 | 16 | 10 | 12 | 9 |
| 2 | 11 | 12 | 4 | 4 | 3 |
| 3 | 16 | 15 | 8 | 10 | 7 |
| 4 | 20 | 18 | 1 | 15 | 1 |
| 5 | 2 | 1 | 7 | 8 | 5 |
| 6 | 4 | 2 | 6 | 20 | 14 |
| 7 | 12 | 11 | 3 | 7 | 2 |
| 8 | 13 | 10 | 2 | 17 | 4 |
| 9 | 8 | 7 | 16 | 5 | 13 |
| 10 | 18 | 20 | 14 | 19 | 17 |
| 11 | 10 | 8 | 11 | 11 | 8 |
| 12 | 9 | 13 | 15 | 18 | 15 |
| 13 | 3 | 4 | 20 | 3 | 20 |
| 14 | 14 | 14 | 5 | 14 | 6 |
| 15 | 19 | 19 | 9 | 16 | 10 |
| 16 | 1 | 3 | 17 | 2 | 16 |
| 17 | 5 | 6 | 18 | 6 | 19 |
| 18 | 6 | 9 | 19 | 1 | 18 |
| 19 | 15 | 17 | 12 | 13 | 12 |
| 20 | 7 | 5 | 13 | 9 | 11 |
The bold letter indicates the top 30 % of overall subwatershed ranks