Skip to main content
. 2013 Jan;131(1):71–78. doi: 10.1542/peds.2012-1029

TABLE 3.

Regression Analyses Predicting Outcomes at Wave 3 for Adolescents Reporting PVO at Wave 2, Stratified by Gender

Male (n = 2254) Female (n = 2816)
Coefficient, b (95% CI) P Value Coefficient, b (95% CI) P Value
Depression 0.36 (–0.02 to 0.74) .06 0.21 (–0.57 to 1.00) .40
Self-esteem −0.18 (–0.45 to 0.08) .18 −0.15 (–0.42 to 0.13) .30
Antisocial behaviors 0.33 (0.12 to 0.54) .003 0.04 (–0.10 to 0.18) .57
Sexual risk takinga −0.07 (–0.37 to 0.23) .63 0.19 (–0.08 to 0.46) .17
Coefficient, aOR (95% CI) P Value Coefficient, aOR (95% CI) P Value
Extreme weight control 1.63 (0.60 to 4.40) .34 1.47 (0.93 to 2.33) .10
Suicidal ideation 1.90 (1.13 to 3.20) .02 1.61 (0.94 to 2.77) .09
Suicide attempt 1.33 (0.41 to 4.35) .63 2.12 (0.93 to 4.86) .08
Smoking 0.99 (0.72 to 1.36) .96 1.16 (0.90 to 1.51) .25
Heavy episodic drinking 1.24 (0.92 to 1.68) .16 1.44 (1.03 to 2.01) .04
Marijuana use 1.34 (1.03 to 1.74) .03 1.11 (0.86 to 1.44) .43
Other drug use 1.36 (0.93 to 1.98) .12 1.40 (0.97 to 2.00) .07
Adult IPV victimization 2.08 (1.53 to 2.84) < .001 1.87 (1.44 to 2.43) < .001

All analyses controlled for race, age, socioeconomic status, child maltreatment, pubertal status, and gender. Each analysis also controlled for the dependent variable at Wave 2 (eg, in the regression for depression, depression at Wave 2 was included as a covariate). Analyses for females also included forced sex as a covariate.

a

Results are for the subset of participants who were sexually active at Waves 2 and 3.