TABLE 4.

Regression Analyses Predicting Outcomes at Wave 3 for Adolescents Reporting PPV at Wave 2, Stratified by Gender

	Male (n = 1909)		Female (n = 2501)
	Coefficient, b (95% CI)	P Value	Coefficient, b (95% CI)	P Value
Depression	0.89 (0.01 to 1.76)	.05	0.90 (0.12 to 1.67)	.03
Self-esteem	−0.06 (–0.42 to 0.30)	.75	−0.18 (–0.50 to 0.13)	.26
Antisocial behaviors	0.54 (–0.05 to 1.14)	.08	0.03 (–0.17 to 0.22)	.80
Sexual risk takinga	0.006 (–0.34 to 0.35)	.97	−0.11 (–0.44 to 0.22)	.52
	Coefficient, aOR (95% CI)	P Value	Coefficient, aOR (95% CI)	P Value
Extreme weight control	n/a	n/a	0.95 (0.46 to 1.96)	.90
Suicidal ideation	1.90 (0.96 to 3.74)	.07	2.07 (1.17 to 3.66)	.01
Suicide attempt	n/a	n/a	1.87 (0.81 to 4.32)	.15
Smoking	1.04 (0.63 to 1.71)	.88	1.53 (1.13 to 2.06)	.006
Heavy episodic drinking	1.13 (0.72 to 1.76)	.61	0.98 (0.64 to 1.48)	.91
Marijuana use	1.13 (0.72 to 1.79)	.59	1.06 (0.70 to 1.60)	.78
Other drug use	1.20 (0.74 to 1.92)	.46	0.98 (0.58 to 1.64)	.93
Adult IPV victimization	3.56 (2.34 to 5.42)	< .001	2.79 (2.06 to 3.77)	< .001

All analyses controlled for race, age, socioeconomic status, child maltreatment, pubertal status, and gender. Each analysis also controlled for the dependent variable at Wave 2 (eg, in the regression for depression, depression at Wave 2 was included as a covariate). Analyses for females also included forced sex as a covariate. n/a, indicates that the cell count for male victims at Wave 3 was too small to obtain a reliable estimate.

^aResults are for the subset of participants who were sexually active at Waves 2 and 3.