Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: Acad Med. 2013 Jan;88(1):10.1097/ACM.0b013e31827644ef. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e31827644ef

Table 3.

Strategies, Outputs, Outcomes, and Methods to Evaluate the Translational Biology and Molecular Medicine (TBMM) Program at Baylor College of Medicine and the Molecular Medicine (MMED) Program at the Cleveland Clinic/Case Western Reserve University

Strategies (approaches to achieve goals) Outputs (direct results of program activities) Outcomes (anticipated results in 1–6 years) Methods (approaches to measure outcomes)
Develop and implement strategies/processes for student recruitment and selection
  • Number of qualified applicants and grant-eligible program matriculants

  • Number of graduates pursuing translational/clinical postdocs or jobs in industry

  • Attract and admit qualified graduate students interested in translational and/or clinical research careers

  • Demographics from applications

  • Student matriculation questionnaire

  • Annual research interest questionnaire for students

  • Exit interviews with graduates

Design new courses and/or modify existing courses to emphasize molecular biology, ethics, pathophysiology, and biostatistics/epidemiology
  • Number and type of courses/activities

  • Number and nature of program changes

  • Percent of students assigning positive ratings to courses/activities

  • Identify successful approaches to train graduate students in medicine and pathobiology

  • Help faculty refine teaching skills to facilitate active learning in translational contexts

  • Curriculum meetings/retreats

  • Student course evaluations

  • Student assessments of faculty

  • Class meetings with students

  • Focus groups (students/faculty)

  • One-on-one interviews with students

Create unique clinical experiences, enrichment activities, and dual-mentoring approach for students
  • Types of clinical experiences for students

  • Student and clinical mentor’s perceptions of clinical experience

  • Number of new collaborations between basic scientists and clinicians attributed to program

  • Help students gain understanding of culture and practice of medicine

  • Develop a cadre of clinicians experienced in training graduate students

  • Improve faculty perceptions about the co-mentoring of graduate students

  • Student logs of clinical experience

  • Student course evaluations

  • Periodic faculty questionnaires

  • One-on-one interviews with students

  • Training sessions for clinical faculty

Assess student performance
  • Number of students making satisfactory progress towards thesis degree

  • Number of students presenting translational/ clinical research at regional/national meetings

  • Number and type of students’ scholarly products

  • Number of students passing qualifying exam

  • Number of students with translational/clinical research aim to thesis

  • Improve students’ knowledge of and skills in basic, translational, and clinical research methods

  • Have students conduct medically relevant research

  • Faculty/peer assessments of student performance/research

  • Thesis committee reports (two per year)

  • Annual review of students’ progress

  • Annual review of students’ curriculum vitae

  • Students’ performance on qualifying exam and thesis

Impact (anticipated results in 7–10 years)

  • Integrate basic, translational, and clinical research in the preparation of scientists
  • Facilitate basic science discoveries to translational and clinical applications