. 2012 Dec 26;7(12):e52453. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0052453

Table 2. Pairwise comparisons using Dunn’s procedure of extant and extinct taxa.

	C. crocuta	P. leo	P. atrox	S. fatalis
Asfc
A. jubatus	−41.6 ^*	−32.3 ^*	−3.5	−19.7 ^*
C. crocuta		9.3	38.1 ^*	21.9 ^*
P. leo			28.7 ^*	12.6
P. atrox				−16.1 ^*
epLsar
A. jubatus	22.4 ^*	23.6 ^*	20.6 ^*	30.6 ^*
C. crocuta		1.2	−1.8	8.2
P. leo			−3.0	7.0
P. atrox				10.0
Smc
A. jubatus	21.9 ^*	13.2	−10.5	0.0
C. crocuta		−8.8	−32.4 ^*	−21.9 ^*
P. leo			−23.7 ^*	−13.1
P. atrox				10.5
Tfv
A. jubatus	−26.3 ^*	−18.4 ^*	−3.1	−18.3 ^*
C. crocuta		7.9	23.2 ^*	8.1
P. leo			15.3 ^*	0.1
P. atrox				−15.1 ^*
HAsfc₍₃ _×3)
A. jubatus	9.7	6.8	4.6	16.2 ^*
C. crocuta		−2.9	−5.1	6.5
P. leo			−2.2	9.4
P. atrox				11.6
HAsfc₍₉ _×9)
A. jubatus	12.4	6.6	19.8 ^*	24.1 ^*
C. crocuta		−5.8	7.4	11.7
P. leo			13.3	17.5 ^*
P. atrox				4.3

Significant values (p<0.05) represent analyses performed absent of the Bonferroni correction (see methods). Asfc, area-scale fractal complexity; epLsar, anisotropy; Smc, scale of maximum complexity; Tfv, texture fill volume; HAsfc _(3×3), HAsfc _(9×9) heterogeneity of complexity in a 3×3 and 9×9 grid, respectively.