Table 2. Classified neuropsychological data of the patients with galactosemia.
Very low | Low | Below average | Average | Above average | High | Very high | |
Expected distribution | 2.3% | 7.4% | 17.7% | 45.2% | 17.7% | 7.4% | 2.3% |
Rey Complex Figure | |||||||
Copy | 68.2% | 13.6% | 18.2%1 | ||||
Time to copy | - | 8.3% | 91.7%1 | ||||
Immediate Recall | 59.1% | 22.7% | 9.1% | 4.5% | 4.5% | - | - |
Delayed Recall | 54.5% | 27.3% | 9.1% | 9.1% | - | - | - |
Recognition | 27.3% | 18.2% | 18.2% | 31.8% | 4.5% | - | - |
Bourdon-Vos | |||||||
Total RT | - | 59.1% | 27.3% | 13.6% | - | - | - |
Number of omissions | 59.1% | 36.4% | 4.5% | ||||
Number of corrections | 4.5% | 45.5% | 50.0% | ||||
Number of errors | 36.4% | 63.3% | - | ||||
Digit Span | |||||||
42.9% | 23.8% | 14.3% | 19.0% | - | - | - |
Presented are the percentages of patients scoring within the particular classifications as described in Lezak [48]: z<−2 very low; −2<z<−1.3 low; −1.3<z<−0.6 below average; −0.6<z<0.6 average; 0.6<z<1.3 above average; 1.3<z<2 high; z>2 very high. Note that the expected distribution reflects percentages based on the normal distribution.
Below average or higher.