Table 2.
Quality Indicators From Newcastle-Ottawa Scale40* |
|||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Studies | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5A | 5B | 6 | 7 | 8 |
Case-control | |||||||||
French et al,10 1985 | No | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | No |
Agbayewa,11 1986 | No | Yes | No | No | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | No |
Shalat et al,13 1987 | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | No |
Broe et al,12 1990 | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | No |
Kokmen et al,6 1991 | No | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | No |
Speck et al,7 1995 | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | No |
Tsolaki et al,8 1997 | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | No | No | No | No | No |
Zalsman et al,14 2000 | No | Yes | No | No | No | No | No | No | No |
Green et al,9 2003 | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | No | No |
Cohort | |||||||||
Buntinx et al,15 1996 | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Devanand et al,16 1996 | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | Yes |
Chen et al,20 1997 | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Palsson et al,21 1999 | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | Yes |
Li et al,22 2001 | No | No | No | Yes | No | No | No | No | Yes |
Lindsay et al,23 2002 | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Zubenko et al,17 2003 | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | No | Yes | No | Yes |
Kessing and Nilsson,18 2003 | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | No | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Steffens et al,24 2004 | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | Yes |
Dal Forno etal,19 2005 | No | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | No |
Andersen et al,25 2005 | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | Yes |
For case-control studies, 1 indicates cases independently validated; 2, cases are representative of population; 3, community controls; 4, controls have no history of Alzheimer disease; 5A, study controls forage; 5B, study controls for additional factor(s); 6, ascertainment of exposure by blinded interview or record; 7, same method of ascertainment used for cases and controls; and 8, nonresponse rate the same for cases and controls. For cohort studies, 1 indicates exposed cohort truly representative; 2, nonexposed cohort drawn from the same community; 3, ascertainment of exposure; 4, outcome of interest not present at start; 5A, cohorts comparable on basis of age; 5B, cohorts comparable on other factor(s); 6, quality of outcome assessment; 7, follow-up long enough for outcomes to occur; and 8, complete accounting for cohorts.