Skip to main content
. 2004 Mar;48(3):930–939. doi: 10.1128/AAC.48.3.930-939.2004

TABLE 3.

Hybridization profiles from Southern analyses of wild-type and mutant strains

Mutant Restriction endonuclease(s) Probea Hybridizing fragment (kb)
Parentb Mutant
ceaS2-Fs EcoRI/NruI ceaS2 3.5 2.0
apr 3.5 None
ΔceaS1::apr NcoI ceaS1 1.2c Nonec
apr None 3.4
ΔceaS1::apr/ceaS2-Fs NcoI ceaS1 1.2c Nonec
apr None 3.4
bls1::tsr NcoI bls1 1.9c 3.0c
tsr None 3.0
bls1::tsr/bls2::apr NcoI bls1 1.9c 3.0c
tsr None 3.0
oat1::neo BglII oat1 4.3 2.4 and 2.9
neo None 2.4 and 2.9
oat1::neo/oat2::apr BglII oat2 6.5 7.95
neo None 7.95
a

Gene-specific probes are described in Materials and Methods. An approximately 1.5-kb fragment from pUC120Apr was used as the apramycin-specific probe. An approximately 1-kb EcoRI-HindIII fragment from pTSR#8 was used as the thiostrepton-specific probe. An approximately 1-kb BamHI-HindIII fragment from pFDNeo-S was used as the neomycin-specific probe.

b

ceaS2::apr was the parental strain for the ceaS2-Fs mutant, ceaS2-Fs was the parental strain for the ΔceaS1::apr/ceaS2-Fs double mutant, bls2::apr was the parental strain for the bls1::tsr/bls2::apr double mutant, and oat1::apr was the parental strain for the oat1::neo/oat2::apr double mutant. For all other mutants, the parental strain was the wild type.

c

Faint cross-hybridizing bands were observed which can be attributed to the presence of the respective paralogues.