Table 2. Comparison of methods.
Wet | Dry | Water Content | Inorganic | Organic | ||
Smallest Extreme | Egg | 22.19 | 12 | 7.34 | 0.28 | 11.87 |
Embryo | 35 | 8 | 26.7 | 0.4 | 7 | |
Change (%) | 57.73% | −33.33% | 263.80% | 42.86% | −41.03% | |
Largest Extreme | Egg | 45.09 | 23.79 | 27.35 | 1.44 | 22.71 |
Embryo | 70 | 15.5 | 58 | 1.74 | 13.67 | |
Change (%) | 55.25% | −34.85% | 112.07% | 20.83% | −39.81% | |
Mean | Egg | 34.15±8.90 | 18.15±4.35 | 16.00±6.63 | 0.88±0.29 | 17.27±4.16 |
Embryo | 49.79±5.59 | 17.21±2.65 | 32.59±5.45 | 1.00±0.24 | 16.21±2.64 | |
Change (%) | 45.79% | −5.22% | 103.66% | 12.65% | −6.13% |
Comparison of mean mass values with the smallest and largest mass values obtained when taking into account the biological heterogeneity of egg and embryo size for Heterodontus portusjacksoni. Percentage change is over the embryonic development from freshly deposited egg to near full-term embryo.