Skip to main content
. 2012 Dec 20;53(12):853–859. doi: 10.4111/kju.2012.53.12.853

TABLE 3.

Comparison of treatment outcomes between eESWL and dESWL groups according to stone size or location

graphic file with name kju-53-853-i003.jpg

Values are presented as mean±SD or no. of patients (%).

ESWL, extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy; eESWL, early ESWL; dESWL, deferred ESWL.