TABLE 4.
Characteristic | Positive pregnancy attitudes | Nonuse of effective method at last sex | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Bivariate | Multivariate | Bivariate | Multivariate | |
Male‡ | 2.31 (1.29–4.13)* | 4.81 (2.29–10.13)* | 0.46 (0.26–0.82)* | 0.77 (0.34–1.78) |
Race/ethnicity | ||||
White (ref) | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
Black | 1.45 (0.75–2.81) | na | 0.50 (0.26–0.99)* | 0.53 (0.25–1.14) |
Hispanic | 1.26 (0.61–2.59) | na | 0.98 (0.47–1.97) | 1.16 (0.53–2.55) |
High school graduate/GED‡ | 1.23 (0.70–2.14) | na | 0.85 (0.49–1.48) | na |
No. in network who attend school | 0.92 (0.85–0.99)† | 0.82 (0.74–0.92)* | 0.92 (0.85–0.99)* | 1.00 (0.88–1.14) |
No. in network who attend school x gender | na | na | na | 0.86 (0.72–1.02) |
No. of years since first left home§ | 1.40 (1.06–1.83)* | 1.55 (1.15–2.09)* | 1.09 (0.83–1.43) | na |
Slept outdoors in past month‡ | 1.11 (0.62–1.98) | na | 1.70 (0.95–3.04)† | 1.30 (0.64–2.63) |
Had lived in ≥2 states since leaving home‡ | 0.85 (0.47–1.53) | na | 0.75 (0.42–1.34) | na |
Frequency of depressive symptoms | 1.01 (0.72–1.42) | na | 0.85 (0.60–1.19) | na |
Alcohol use | 0.95 (0.93–0.98)* | 0.94 (0.91–0.98)* | 1.01 (0.99–1.04) | na |
Commitment to recent partner | 1.47 (1.05–2.06)* | 1.79 (1.23–2.61)* | 1.62 (0.17–2.25)* | 1.54 (1.08–2.20)* |
No. in network who are relatives | 1.10 (1.01–1.19)* | 1.11 (1.00–1.24)* | 0.97 (0.89–1.06) | na |
No. in network who have risky sex | ||||
0 (ref) | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
1–2 | 0.29 (0.13–0.65)* | 0.42 (0.16–1.06)† | 0.68 (0.31–1.51) | na |
≥3 | 0.33 (0.17–0.72)* | 0.52 (0.23–1.20) | 0.73 (0.35–1.54) | na |
Would be pleased by pregnancy‡ | na | na | 1.64 (0.93–2.88)† | 1.48 (0.77–2.84) |
p<.05.
p<.10.
Dichotomous measure. All other characteristics for which no reference category is shown are continuous or scaled.
Divided by age and standardized. Notes: Gender interactions with each independent variable were tested; none of the interaction terms was associated with positive pregnancy attitudes. For nonuse of effective method, gender had a significant interaction with Hispanic ethnicity (p=.03) and a marginally significant interaction with number of network members who attend school (p=.07). The interaction between gender and Hispanic ethnicity was not included because the associations were not significant in the full sample or for either gender.
ref=reference group. na=not applicable, because item was not included in the analysis.