Table 2.
Fitting statistics of 7 competing models that are only different in the number of latent classes
|
# latent classes (G) |
OHTS |
EGPS |
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BIC | LMR-LRT* | Minimal class size | BIC | LMR-LRT | Minimal class size | |
| 2 |
97097 |
<0.001 |
47% |
39235 |
<0.001 |
44% |
| 3 |
94219 |
0.002 |
24% |
38395 |
0.001 |
14% |
| 4 |
92922 |
0.609 |
14% |
38109 |
0.005 |
11% |
| 5 |
92107 |
0.003 |
13% |
37870 |
0.009 |
12% |
| 6 |
91644 |
0.042 |
10% |
37760 |
0.452 |
9% |
| 7 |
91289 |
0.147 |
7% |
37682 |
0.060 |
5% |
| 8 | 91045 | 0.406 | 6% | 37608 | 0.011 | 4% |
* Lo-Mendell-Rubin likelihood ratio test, with a smaller p-value favoring the G-class model over the model with G-1 classes (null hypothesis).