Skip to main content
. 2004 Mar;14(3):442–450. doi: 10.1101/gr.1571904

Table 5.

MC Analysis for Cases of Discrepancy Between the Relative Frequency of Indels in the Simulation Model and MC Analysis Model

θ simulated Actual t Observed t (ermse) Estimated t (ermse)
0.112 0.1 0.107 (0.0263) 0.105 (0.0262)
0.450 0.103 (0.0254) 0.107 (0.0318)
0.112 0.2 0.206 (0.0306) 0.204 (0.0336)
0.450 0.205 (0.0346) 0.245 (0.0716)
0.112 0.3 0.298 (0.0489) 0.288 (0.0462)
0.450 0.295 (0.0490) 0.379 (0.1080)

Pairs of sequences were simulated with the value of θ shown (the rate of indels relative to nucleotide substitutions). The value of θ assumed in the MC alignment analysis was 0.225. There were 50 replicates per value simulated.