Skip to main content
. 2012 Dec 3;31(2):272–279. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2011.40.6249

Table 1.

Demographics and Clinical Characteristics, Psychosocial Status, and Quality of Life at the Time of the Initial Survey (2005): Comparison of Patients Who Did and Did Not Participate in the Follow-Up Survey (2010)

Baseline Demographic or Clinical Characteristic Participants(n = 566)
Nonparticipants, Assumed Living (n = 144)a
Pb Deceased at Follow-Up(n = 176)
Pc
No. % No. % No. %
Demographics
    Female sex 294 51.9 78 54.2 .633 79 44.9 .102
    White race 494 87.3 108 75.0 < .001 155 88.1 .783
    Income < $30,000 113 22.2 53 41.4 < .001 59 37.8 < .001
    College or postgraduate degree 242 43.6 50 35.7 .091 45 26.6 < .001
    Married or living with a partner 452 80.4 96 68.1 .001 124 71.3 .011
    Age, years < .001 < .001
        Mean 62.4 56.7 69.5
        SD 12.4 15.6 11.7
Clinical characteristicsd
    Had an indolent type of lymphoma 270 50.3 76 55.9 .243 99 60.7 .019
    Was diagnosed at stage > I 339 68.1 76 62.3 .224 104 71.2 .467
    Systemic treatment statuse
        Received chemotherapy only 257 45.4 72 50.0 .324 74 42.1 .433
        Received biologic therapy only 29 5.1 7 4.9 .898 5 2.8 .206
        Received chemotherapy and biologic therapy 108 19.1 16 11.1 .025 39 22.2 .371
        Received a transplantation 90 15.9 15 10.4 .098 30 17.1 .719
        Did not receive systemic treatment 82 14.5 34 23.6 .008 28 15.9 .643
    Was currently receiving treatment 58 10.4 22 15.6 .083 37 21.8 < .001
    Had active diseasef 47 9.1 20 15.9 .027 42 28.2 < .001
    Had a recurrence of disease 184 33.2 39 28.7 .317 70 42.7 .001
    Time since diagnosis, years .156 .747
        Mean 10.4 9.5 10.2
        SD 7.1 6.5 7.3
    Comorbidity scoreg .166 < .001
        Mean 5.2 5.8 6.7
        SD 4.5 5.5 5.2
    Had a second primary cancer 71 12.7 16 11.4 .673 33 19.4 .027
    Lymphoma symptom scoreh .001 < .001
        Mean 49.3 46.3 44.4
        SD 8.8 11.5 11.0
Psychosocial status scores
    Social Supporti .079 .514
        Mean 83.4 80.7 84.3
        SD 16.0 17.1 17.3
    IOC Negative Impactj .080 .003
        Mean 2.2 2.3 2.4
        SD 0.7 0.9 0.8
    IOC Positive Impactk .978 .181
        Mean 3.5 3.5 3.4
        SD 0.8 0.8 0.8
Quality-of-life scores
    SF-36 PCSl .033 < .001
        Mean 47.2 45.0 39.1
        SD 10.2 11.3 11.5
    SF-36 MCSm < .001 < .001
        Mean 50.4 45.7 45.7
        SD 10.7 11.3 11.7

Abbreviations: IOC, Impact of Cancer; MCS, Mental Component Score; PCS, Physical Component Score; SD, standard deviation; SF-36, Medical Outcomes Study Short Form-36.

a

Assumed living; calculated as total initial sample (N = 866) minus participants (n = 566) minus deceased (n = 176).

b

P value for comparison of participants and nonparticipants, based on χ2 for percentages and t test for means.

c

P value for comparison of participants and decedents, based on χ2 for percentages and t test for means.

d

Does not include changes between baseline and follow-up surveys.

e

Systemic treatment at initial survey includes chemotherapy, biologic therapy, and bone marrow or stem-cell transplantation.

f

Was not in remission or cured of non-Hodgkin lymphoma.

g

Self-Administered Comorbidity Questionnaire; possible score range, 0 to 42.

h

Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy–Lymphoma module; 15 items, possible score range, 0 to 60. Lower scores indicate greater symptoms.

i

Medical Outcomes Study Social Support total score; possible score range, 0 to 100; higher scores indicate higher support.

j

IOC Negative Summary score; possible score range, 1 to 5; higher scores indicate greater negative impacts.

k

IOC Positive Summary score; possible score range, 1 to 5; higher scores indicate greater positive impacts.

l

The median population score is 50; a higher score indicates better functioning.

m

The median population score is 50; a higher score indicates better functioning.