Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Mar 1.
Published in final edited form as: Adv Healthc Mater. 2012 Feb 16;1(2):172–176. doi: 10.1002/adhm.201200002

Table 1.

Summary of properties of different samples and quantification of cellular attachment. Student’s t-test comparison to untreated np-Au.

Surface % Average
Porosity
Average Pore
Area [nm2]
% Average
Cell Coverage
Average Cell
Area [µm2]
Average Cell
Density [mm−2]
Glass - - 26.7 ± 9.7 1191 ± 260** 104 ± 24
Gold - - 39.7 ± 7.0* 1457 ± 116** 119 ± 28
np-Au (untreated) 24.6 ± 1.6 2786 ± 531 19.6 ± 4.9 855 ± 101 100 ± 24
np-Au (heat-treated) 25.1 ± 0.3 23682 ± 2062*** 23.1 ± 4.0 914 ± 65 110 ± 19

Statistical significance in comparison to untreated np-Au:

*

p<0.001 (n=20);

**

p<0.005 (n=20);

***

p<0.002 (n=6)