Table 1.
Correlations of pedographic results
| Correlations | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Region | Coefficient of correlation loading vs. AOFAS | Coefficient of correlation loading vs. VAS | Coefficient of correlation loading vs. Phillips |
| Correlations between loading and the three different scoring systems | |||
| Heel | −0,088 | −0,085 | −0,029 |
| Midfoot | 0,099 | 0,155 | 0,161 |
| MT 1 | −0,289 | −0,180 | −0,215 |
| MT 2 | −0,334 | −0,274 | −0,157 |
| MT 3 | −0,009 | −0,081 | −0,007 |
| MT 4 | 0,323 | 0,301 | 0,362* |
| MT 5 | 0,366* | 0,318 | 0,432* |
| Hallux | −0,390* | −0,355* | −0,355* |
| Toe 2 | −0,412* | −0,301 | −0,409* |
| Toes 3, 4, 5 | −0,255 | −0,212 | −0,324 |
| Coefficient of correlation FTI vs. AOFAS | Coefficient of correlation FTI vs. VAS | Coefficient of correlation FTI vs. Philips | |
| Correlations between FTI and the three scoring systems | |||
| Heel | −0,099 | −0,189 | −0,184 |
| Midfoot | −0,181 | −0,150 | −0,196 |
| MT1 | −0,371* | −0,297 | −0,279 |
| MT2 | −0,475* | −0,422* | −0,360* |
| MT3 | −0,270 | −0,323 | −0,252 |
| MT4 | 0,203 | 0,193 | 0,251 |
| MT5 | 0,334 | 0,307 | 0,401* |
| Hallux | −0,535* | −0,466* | −0,518* |
| Toe 2 | −0,482* | −0,428* | −0,487* |
| Toes 3, 4, 5 | −0,291 | −0,255 | −0,354* |
AOFAS American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society, FTI force-time integral, VAS visual analogue scale
*p < 0,05