Skip to main content
. 2012 Dec 16;2012:617028. doi: 10.1155/2012/617028

Table 1.

Comparative counts in EPG.

Sample number Kato Katz New method
1 864 1120
2 528 938
3 408 216
4 1800 2232
5 400 284
6 6384 4938
7 3072 2088
8 280 456
9 4032 2850
10 0 72
11 2064 1700
12 120 0
13 2829 1856
14 0 128
15 0 0
16 1920 1200
17 408 827
18 120 0
19 48 0
20 360 432