Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Nov 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Mem Lang. 2012 Sep 6;67(4):426–448. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2012.07.003

Table 6.

2 × 2 ANOVAs: 1effects of Violation Type and Relatedness on violated nouns within the 150–250ms, N400 (300–500ms) and P600 (700–900ms) time windows.

Main effect of Violation Type Main effect of Relatedness Interaction between Violation Type and Relatedness
DoF F value DoF F value DoF F value
150–250ms

Midline 1, 19 0.01 1, 19 9.58** 1, 19 9.390**
Medial 1, 19 0.02 1, 19 7.47* 1, 19 16.671**
Lateral 1, 19 0.54 1, 19 8.30* 1, 19 11.792**
Peripheral 1, 19 .90 1, 19 7.81* 1, 19 9.74**

N400 (300–500ms)

Midline 0.22 5.17* 1, 19 4.20 1, 19 2.34*
Medial 0.22 4.51* 1, 19 5.31* 1, 19 14.88**
Lateral 1, 19 4.39* 1, 19 6.22* 1, 19 16.39***
Peripheral 1, 19 3.78 1, 19 4.82* 1, 19 9.26**

P600 (700–900ms)

Midline 1, 19 12.21** 1, 19 0.02 1, 19 1.46
Medial 1, 19 14.03** 1, 19 0.02 1, 19 2.21
Lateral 1, 19 10.06** 1, 19 0.00 1, 19 2.44
Peripheral 1, 19 11.01** 1, 19 0.20 1, 19 0.22
*

p < .05

**

p < .01.

***

p < .001.

****

p < .0001.