Skip to main content
. 2012 Nov 27;2(6):e001686. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2012-001686

Table 3.

Immediate impact of Universal Coverage Scheme on hospital sector market share*

Therapeutic area Licensing status Immediate postpolicy absolute change in % market share (95% CI)
Diabetes
Antidiabetics Originator brand −0.3% (−1.6 to 1.0)
Branded generic 12.3% (−16.0 to −8.7)*
Generic 3.5% (−5.8 to −1.1)*
GPO 16.1% (12.0 to 20.2)*
Insulins‡ Originator brand† −0.04% (−0.4 to 0.3)
Branded generic 7.0% (2.9 to 11.1)*
Generic 6.2% (−10.3 to −2.1)*
Cardiovascular disease
Antihypertensives Originator brand† −0.1% (−2.3 to 2.0)
Branded generic† −0.2% (−6.1 to 1.8)
Generic 5.7% (−8.3 to −3.0)*
GPO 5.3% (−0.1 to 10.6)
Lipid regulating agents Originator brand† 7.8% (−10.2 to −5.4)*
Branded generic† 7.6% (5.1 to 10.0)*
Generic 0.2% (−0.4 to 0.7)
GPO 0.2% (−0.3 to 0.8)
Cardiac therapy Originator brand 0.1% (−0.8 to 1.0)
Branded generic† 13.5% (−20.5 to −6.5)*
Generic 4.3% (−6.2 to −2.4)*
GPO 21.6% (15.0 to 28.1)*
Cancer‡
Antineoplastics Originator brand 1.1% (−1.0 to 3.2)
Branded generic −1.0% (−5.4 to 3.4)
Generic 0.4% (−2.7 to 3.4)
Cytostatic hormones Originator brand† 0.4% (−5.4 to 6.1)
Branded generic† 7.7% (−12.0 to −3.5)*
Generic† 6.0% (1.4 to 10.6)*
Immunostimulating agents Originator brand 6.4% (−9.7 to −3.0)*
Branded generic 4.5% (1.7 to 7.3)*
Generic −0.2% (−0.3 to 0.02)

*Statistically significant regression coefficient (p<0.05). Changes are in absolute terms (ie, percentage point change).

†Quadratic model (which has a squared postpolicy trend term) fits better than linear model.

‡GPO did not produce any insulins or cancer medicines during the study period.

Note 1: See online appendix table 4 and figures 9–16 for market share regression coefficients and figures for all therapeutic areas.

Note 2: Aside from the immediate level changes following the policy, there were few major changes in market share. See online appendix table 5 for absolute 1- and 5-year differences.