Table 4.
Conventional procedure |
Biochip mosaic |
||
---|---|---|---|
Diagnose | Findings | Diagnose | Findings |
LAD, n = 6 |
2 with linear IgA deposits on salt-split skin, 4 with anti-LAD-1 IgA reactivity |
NS, n = 5; pemphigoid, n = 1 |
1 with linear IgG/IgA deposits on salt-split skin; 5 without IR |
p200, n = 5 |
linear IgG deposits on salt-split skin and anti-p200 protein/ laminin γ1 reactivity |
NS, n = 3; pemphigoid, n = 2 |
2 with linear IgG/IgA deposits on monkey esophagus and salt split skin; 3 without IR |
MMP, n = 6 |
3 with anti-LAD-1 IgG reactivity, 3 with anti-laminin 332 reactivity |
NS, n = 4; pemphigoid, n = 2 |
2 with linear IgG/IgA deposits on monkey esophagus and salt-split skin; 4 without IR |
DH, n = 2 |
IgA reactivity with endomysium on monkey esophagus and anti-transglutaminase IgA reactivity |
NS, n = 2 |
no IR |
PNP, n = 2 |
Both with anti- Dsg3 reactivity and anti envoplakin reactivity |
PV, n = 2 |
intercellular IgG/IgA deposits on monkey esophagus and Dsg 3-transfected cells |
BP, n = 2 |
positive BP180NC16A ELISA |
NS, n = 2 |
no IR |
NS, n = 1 | No IR | PV, n = 1 | intercellular IgG/IgA deposits on monkey esophagus and Dsg 3-transfected cells |
In 21 sera (white background), final diagnosis was based on findings by conventional procedures as explained. In 3 sera (grey background), no final diagnosis could be made. In these cases, direct immunofluorescence microscopy would be required.
IR, immunoreactivity; LAD, linear IgA dermatosis; LAD-1, linear IgA dermatosis antigen 1(soluble ectodomain of BP180); p200, p200-pemphigoid; MMP, mucous membrane pemphigoid; DH, dermatitis herpetiformis; BP, bullous pemphigoid; PV, pemphigus vulgaris; NS, normal serum; PNP, paraneoplastic pemphigus; Dsg 3, desmoglein 3.