Table 4.

Pairwise correlations between the distance matrices within each data set as well as compared to simple taxonomic structure and random structure.

(A)
	Garrard et al. sensory	Cree and McRae perceptual	Garrard et al. functional	Cree and McRae functional (n = 38)	Garrard et al. encyclopedic	Cree and McRae encyclopedic (n = 47)	Hoffman et al. verbal	Taxonomic structure	Random structure
Rogers et al. visual	0.55***	0.35*	0.27	−0.13	0.40**	0.26	0.06	0.40**	−0.03
Garrard et al. Sensory		0.52***	0.37*	−0.15	0.29	0.15	−0.05	0.60***	0.02
Cree and McRae perceptual			0.19	−0.32*	0.24	0.19	0.03	0.32*	0.01
Garrard et al. functional				0.11	0.14	0.01	0.30*	0.31*	0.01
Cree and McRae functional (n = 38)					−0.13	−0.16	−0.03	−0.04	−0.01
Garrard et al. encyclopedic						0.27	0.12	0.23	−0.06
Cree and McRae encyclopedic (n = 47)							0.07	0.1	−0.02
Hoffman et al. verbal								−0.03	−0.04
(B)
	Garrard et al. sensory	Cree and McRae edited perceptual	Garrard et al. functional	Cree and McRae edited functional	Garrard et al. encyclopedic	Cree and McRae edited encyclopedic	Hoffman et al. verbal	Taxonomic structure	Random structure
Rogers et al. visual	0.55***	0.72***	0.27	0.08	0.40**	0.43**	0.06	0.40**	−0.03
Garrard et al. Sensory		0.65***	0.37*	0.10	0.29	0.42**	−0.05	0.60***	0.02
Cree and McRae edited perceptual			0.42**	0.13	0.36*	0.57***	0.22	0.46**	−0.01
Garrard et al. functional				0.33*	0.14	0.14	0.30*	0.31*	0.01
Cree and McRae edited functional					0.02	−0.03	0.13	0.28*	0.01
Garrard et al. encyclopedic						0.43**	0.12	0.23	−0.06
Cree and McRae edited encyclopedic							0.10	0.30*	−0.01
Hoffman et al. verbal								−0.03	−0.04

(a) With the original Cree and McRae feature lists; (b) with the edited Cree and McRae feature lists. ***p < 0.0005, **p < 0.005, *p < 0.05.