Skip to main content
. 2012 Dec 17;2012:749479. doi: 10.1155/2012/749479

Table 2.

Artemether-lumefantrine efficacy in children in Brazzaville.

Number Percentage 95% CI
No. of patients 77
Responses on day 14
 Withdrawn or loss to follow up 4 5.2 1.4–12.8
 Eligible 73 94.8 87.2–98.6
 ETF 1 1.4 0–7.4
 ACPR 72 98.6 92.6–100
Responses on day 28 (PCR uncorrected)
 Withdrawn or loss to follow up 8 10.4 4.6–19.4
 Eligible 69 89.6 80.6–95.4
 Treatment failure 7 11.3 4.2–19.8
 ETF 1 1.5 0.05–7.8
 LCF 2 2.9 0.4–10.1
 LPF 4 5.5 1.6–14.2
 ACPR 62 89.9 80.2–95.8
Responses on day 28 (PCR corrected)
 Withdrawn or loss to follow up 8 16.9 9.3–27.1
 Eligible 69 86.6 80.6–5.4
 Treatment failure 2 2.9 0.4–10.0
 ETF 1 1.4 0.04–7.8
 Recrudescence 1 1.4 0.04–7.8
 ACPR 67 97.1 89.9–99.6
 PCR analysed isolates
  Recrudescence 1 16.7 0.4–64.1
  Reinfection 5 83.3 35.9–99.6

95% CI: 95% confidence intervals; ETF: early treatment failure; LCF: late clinical failure; LPF: late parasitological failure; ACPR: adequate clinical and parasitological response.

Of these patients, 86.5% (95% CI, 71.2–95.5%) under 5 years old had ACPR response, while 93.8% (95% CI, 79.2–99.2%) of the patients aged between 5 and 10 years old responded with ACPR. The difference in ACPR proportions between these two subpopulations of patients was not significant (P = 0.6, chi-square test).

Of the patients responding with ACPR, 94.1% (95% CI, 80.3–99.3%) were aged <5 years old and 100% (95% CI, 88.4–100%) were aged between 5 and 10 years old. The difference in ACPR proportions between the two subpopulations of patients was not significant (P = 0.5, chi-square test).