Table 5.
Model | Experimental model (EM) | Original Apfel model (OAM) | Refitted Apfel model (RAM) | Simplified Apfel risk score (SARS) | ||||
Diff. | p Value | Diff. | p Value | Diff. | p Value | Diff. | p Value | |
Experimental model (EM) | ||||||||
Original Apfel model (OAM) | 0.118 | <0.0001 | ||||||
Refitted Apfel model (RAM) | 0.110 | <0.0001 | −0.009 | 0.48 | ||||
Simplified Apfel risk score (SARS) | 0.112 | <0.0001 | −0.006 | 0.43 | 0.003 | 0.73 | ||
Refitted Sinclair model (RSM) | 0.028 | 0.03 | −0.090 | 0.0001 | −0.082 | <0.0001 | −0.085 | 0.0001 |
Model | AUC for test set | 95% CI for AUC | HL χ2 | HL (p) |
Experimental model (EM) | 0.738 | 0.698 to 0.779 | 10.0 | 0.27 |
Original Apfel model (OAM) | 0.620 | 0.576 to 0.665 | 66.9 | <0.0001 |
Refitted Apfel model (RAM) | 0.629 | 0.585 to 0.673 | 1.8 | 0.87 |
Simplified Apfel risk score (SARS) | 0.626 | 0.584 to 0.668 | 0.5 | 0.77 |
Refitted Sinclair model (RSM) | 0.711 | 0.669 to 0.752 | 7.4 | 0.50 |
AUC, area the under receiver operating characteristic curve; Diff, AUC difference; HL χ2, Hosmer–Lemeshow χ2; HL (p), Hosmer–Lemeshow probability > χ2; p Value, p value of difference.