Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Card Fail. 2013 Jan;19(1):60–70. doi: 10.1016/j.cardfail.2012.11.003

Table 1.

Effects of TAC ± induced NCX1 transgene expression on [Ca2+]i transients

[Ca2+]o WT-sham WT-TAC NCX1-TAC
Systolic [Ca2+]i, nM
0.6 146 ± 14 (15) 137 ± 12* (10) 136 ± 9 (14)
1.8 223 ± 14 (21) 191 ± 8*(16) 199 ± 10 (12)
5.0 337 ± 19 (20) 267 ± 12* (17) 305 ± 19 (12)
Diastolic [Ca2+]i, nM
0.6 100 ± 10 98 ± 9 96 ± 9
1.8 112 ± 8 103 ± 6 102 ± 8
5.0 113 ± 8 113 ± 5 113 ± 11
[Ca2+]i transient amplitude, % increase in fura2 signal
0.6 8.6 ± 0.9 7.9 ± 0.8* 8.3 ± 0.9#
1.8 19.1 ± 0.9 17.0 ± 0.9* 18.6 ± 1.1#
5.0 34.9 ± 1.4 26.5 ± 1.6* 32.3 ± 1.8#
t1/2 of [Ca2+]i transient decline, ms
0.6 305 ± 17 290 ± 29* 272 ± 18#
1.8 208 ± 11 244 ± 16* 204 ± 10#
5.0 168 ± 8 207 ± 11* 158 ± 6#

Values are means ± SE. Numbers in parentheses are no. of myocytes, without regard to the number of cells contributed by each heart (n=5, 3 and 3 hearts each for WT-sham, WT-TAC and NCX1-TAC, respectively). [Ca2+]o, extracellular Ca2+ concentration; NCX1, cardiac Na+/Ca2+ exchanger; TAC, transverse aortic constriction; WT, wild-type. Data were analyzed by 2-way ANOVA (group, [Ca2+]o).

*

p<0.05, group × [Ca2+]o interaction effect; WT-sham vs. WT-TAC.

#

p<0.02, group or group × [Ca2+]o interaction effect; WT-TAC vs. NCX1-TAC.