Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Jan 3.
Published in final edited form as: New Solut. 2010;20(2):195–210. doi: 10.2190/NS.20.2.e

Table 2.

Adjusted Odds Ratio for Radiation Dose Above the Specified Cut Point. Savannah River Site Workers, 1951–1999*

Contrast Effect estimate Worker demographic group**
Non-black male Non-black female Black male Black female
0 mRem vs. > 0 mRem OR (95% CI)*** Ref. 0.74 (0.70, 0.79) 1.35 (1.27, 1.43) 1.03 (0.94, 1.13)
≤ 50 mRem vs. > 50 mRem OR (95% CI)*** Ref. 0.75 (0.68, 0.83) 1.30 (1.21, 1.41) 1.12 (0.98, 1.26)
≤ 300 mRem vs. > 300 mRem OR (95% CI)*** Ref. 0.71 (0.62, 0.82) 1.13 (1.03, 1.24) 1.01 (0.85, 1.20)
*

Accounting for repeated measures on 18,883 workers, adjusted for decade and job title.

**

N = 257,370 work-years total; dose missing for 20,365 work-years.

***

Analysis among monitored individuals.