Skip to main content
. 2012 May 12;36(8):1695–1700. doi: 10.1007/s00264-012-1562-1

Table 1.

Comparative measures of tibial defect repair by using Ilizarov techniques

Parameter Bifocal combined compression distraction Bifocal consecutive compression distraction Multilevel consecutive fragment lengthening Multilevel simultaneous fragment lengthening
Defect (cm) 12 ± 1.8 11.9 ± 0.6 12.2 ± 1.5 14.1 ± 1.6
Defect to segment limb ratio (%) 30.4 ± 5.7 31.6 ± 1.5 36.6 ± 3.6 42.3 ± 4.0
Distraction (days) 127.0 ± 36.1 144.7 ± 12.6 56.0 ± 4.8 52.8 ± 4.7
Fixation (days) 180.0 ± 25.9 199.0 ± 18.0 101.5 ± 13.4 167.8 ± 18.6
Total osteosynthesis time (days) 323.0 ± 52.1 361.2 ± 25.6 284.1 ± 30.5 291.4 ± 28.6
Fixation index (days/cm)a 17.8 ± 3.3 26.1 ± 2.9 10.3 ± 1.3 16.5 ± 1.9
Osteosynthesis index (days/cm)b 30.7 ± 4.2 46.4 ± 3.9 28.8 ± 5.0 28.7 ± 1.7
Lengthened amount (cm) 10.8 ± 1.2 8.8 ± 0.7 11.2 ± 1.6 10.1 ± 0.7
Lengthened amount, % 92.0 ± 4.6 74.3 ± 3.5 91.2 ± 4.6 78.3 ± 8.1

a Fixation index: ratio of fixation (days) to lengthened amount (cm)

b Osteosynthesis index: ratio of total osteosynthesis period (days) to lengthened amount (cm)