Skip to main content
. 2012 Aug 3;41(Suppl 3):303–312. doi: 10.1007/s13280-012-0308-z

Table 2.

Akaike’s Information Criterion (AIC) and difference in AIC (AICi − AICmin) for candidate models predicting the presence/absence of Arctic char

Model AIC ΔAIC
A + T + B 275.78 40.04
A + P + B 261.51 25.77
A + T + P 252.67 16.93
T + P + B 244.17 8.43
A + T + P + B + A:T + A:P + T:P + A:B + T:B + A:T:P 237.69 1.95
A + T + P + B 236.58 0.84
A + T + P + B + A:T + A:P + T:P + A:B + T:B 235.75 0.01
A + T + P + B + A:T 235.74 0

The full model included the following predictor variables: ln lake area (A), average annual air temperature (T), presence/absence of pike (P), presence/absence of brown trout (B), and several interactions. The model in bold was used to predict future distributions of Arctic char