Table 2.
Model | AIC | ΔAIC |
---|---|---|
A + T + B | 275.78 | 40.04 |
A + P + B | 261.51 | 25.77 |
A + T + P | 252.67 | 16.93 |
T + P + B | 244.17 | 8.43 |
A + T + P + B + A:T + A:P + T:P + A:B + T:B + A:T:P | 237.69 | 1.95 |
A + T + P + B | 236.58 | 0.84 |
A + T + P + B + A:T + A:P + T:P + A:B + T:B | 235.75 | 0.01 |
A + T + P + B + A:T | 235.74 | 0 |
The full model included the following predictor variables: ln lake area (A), average annual air temperature (T), presence/absence of pike (P), presence/absence of brown trout (B), and several interactions. The model in bold was used to predict future distributions of Arctic char